How does fashion influence society

Fashion is all around us, whether we realise it or not. Everywhere we go, we see people wearing different types of clothes, accessories, designs, styles, et cetera.

Obviously, there are people who take fashion very seriously; some of us may feel that they take it a little too seriously and, in a way, let it take over their lives. But the clothes we see models showing off on the catwalk are not so different to what the rest of society quickly throws on each day.

Fashion is constantly changing. But as a society, we seem to underestimate how much fashion really influences us. The clothes that we choose to wear on a regular basis are based simply on personal preferences, however, these particular clothes have most likely been worn by models on the runway at some stage before they hit the well-known stores.

These particular styles have been introduced and re-created into the fashion industry for several years and are continuously merging into our popular retail and department stores, making them available and affordable for the rest of the world.

Perhaps most of society feels insecure and envious of all those models who are continuously introducing and wearing new fashion trends for a living. Fashion also promotes creativity as designers endeavor to outdo one another through their unique and intricate designs.

World View. How Does Fashion Impact Society? More From Reference. Your email address will not be published. Leave this field empty. Positive Impact of Fashion Every year new designs and collections appear in the fashion market that attracts people to buy them to look attractive and stay ahead in the game of style and glamor.

Negative Impact of Fashion Fashion at times makes people spend unnecessarily that affects their financial budget. Previous Article Get the most out of your workout! Read on how! View Post. You May also Like View Post. Leave a Reply Cancel reply Your email address will not be published. Clothing dye and materials including rubber, leather, silk, wool, and cotton were all utilized for the war effort.

The lack of raw materials left scientists and innovators with room to create. From this shortage came the invention of chemical-based, synthetic textiles. For instance, nylon was made for hosiery and as a means of substituting unavailable Japanese silk. In response to Uncle Sam taking away the hosiery staple, American women had to get creative. Ladies would actually stain their legs a brown tone and pencil in a faux seam for the illusion of stockings. Others chose the more practical option of adopting the previously masculine associated trouser.

With postwar peacetime came both an economic and baby boom in America. As men came home from war, couples began starting families at an unprecedented pace and women were ushered back into the home with a renewed focus on traditional nuclear family ideals. Men and women resumed their previously set, conservative gender roles, reminding women of their matriarchal femininity, donning fuller, more shapely and more formal apparel.

As a response to the rationing of the war, Dior wanted to celebrate opulence and femininity. One of the skirts in his debut collection featured over 13 and a half yards of fabric, finely pleated into a full silhouette. Women were ready to welcome back the sense of luxury that these dresses and skirts offered, and the fit and flare shape that Dior made popular would stick around from the end of the s through the '50s.

While the s were filled to the brim with inventions and innovation, there were two advancements that went hand-in-hand with equal cultural weight. With the regulation and dissemination of the female contraceptive birth control pill in , came the dawn of the miniskirt. Introduced by Mary Quant in , the garment quickly became a symbolic force of the sexual revolution and a testament to the progressive Youthquake movement of the swinging '60s.

Women harnessed their autonomy and expressed their sexuality with a newfound freedom, reflected by the highest hemlines women's fashion had yet seen. During the tumultuous political landscape of the s, arts, music, and fashion bloomed with the uprising of counterculture and protests against the Vietnam War. Rather than the austerity that American fashion experiences in times of adversity, British designers and style icons have a tendency to respond to fear, doom, and gloom with bold, bright statements, either fueled by activism and resistance or unity and pride.

Much like when the struggling English public looks to the Monarchy in all their immeasurable wealth for distraction and aspiration, designers look for forms of escapism through design and aesthetic. The two most pivotal staples in British style arose from adversity.

Both glam rock and punk ascended to prominence during the economic downturn in the s, with Vivienne Westwood opening up shop at Kings Road in The high-glam, high-maintenance, rebellious looks of this period transcended time or trend while simultaneously lifting a middle finger to conformity.

Likewise, when the country again experienced a recession in , creative and boundary-pushing designers Alexander McQueen and Hussein Chalayan came onto the scene.

Their other-worldly, and fantastical designs acted as a much needed distraction and transported their viewers to another place and time, offering escapism during the economic downturn in the U. During the Reagan administration, the U. It was a time of excess and decadence, where more was more and bigger was better.

Shoulder pads were larger than life and oversized silhouettes were the norm. An overabundance of hairspray was used, while brighter and bolder colors were favored in both the fashion and beauty industries.