What makes caltech unique
More broadly, it means that every faculty in CS at Caltech has active collaborations with someone outside of CS. As the quotes above point out, Caltech has created an environment where being interdisciplinary is, in a sense, unavoidable and required.
In the local sense, if one thinks of faculty as interacting closely with a dozen or two other faculty members, then at a place like Caltech, this necessarily involves interactions with people in very different departments and areas.
In the more global sense, to have the size to have huge impact, Caltech faculty must pursue cross-cutting agendas. And, because of the risk involved, it is natural to try to let the number of faculty in an area, in a department, and institute-wide grow… However, the effect of this is, in the long run, a change in the culture away from interdisciplinary necessity.
Perhaps the most amazing thing about Caltech is that it has avoided this danger, and maintained its size, for so long. If one thinks about growing a graph, there are two options: add nodes or add edges. The Caltech approach is basically to avoid adding nodes and thus force the creation of edges. The structure that emerges seems to be fundamentally different from that of other schools: more connectivity, more clustering, etc.
You are commenting using your WordPress. You are commenting using your Google account. You are commenting using your Twitter account. It teaches our students our core values: respect, risk-taking, intellectual curiosity, and integrity.
And it gives our staff the freedom and opportunity to act not only as support but as mentors themselves to our students and our faculty, accelerating the Institute's progress and increasing its impact on society.
Our commitment to excellence and to each other's success makes Caltech special. While one of our participants is a planetary scientist Bethany Ehlmann as you might expect, the other three have spent much of their careers working on terrestrial phenomena, including sedimentary geology and earth history John Grotzinger , the origin of igneous rocks Ed Stolper , and terrestrial isotope geochemistry and geochronology Ken Farley.
This is just one example of the rapid convergence of planetary science with terrestrial geoscience—and the kind of interdisciplinary work at which Caltech excels. Keck Foundation Professor of Geochemistry. They've got courage and are willing to swing for the fences. They focus on ideas and experiments that haven't been done before. They are the heart and engine for the research that gets done.
I always like to think of Caltech as this beautiful, quiet place where everyone is focused on excellent research, and it's an environment that's not bureaucratic or hierarchical, but simply fosters interaction, interdisciplinarity, and encourages people asking and trying to answer questions that others haven't thought about.
If you want to study engineering, arguably, Caltech may be considered a better school. If you want to study business or liberal arts, Harvard is probably a better place. For some students, Harvard is better. Caltech is smaller and more specialized than Stanford and has fewer applicants. Their percentage accepted is higher than Stanford but the actual number is smaller because they are a smaller school.
Caltech is one of the most competitive private colleges or universities in the US, with a 8. Caltech is very nerdy. They are the heart and engine for the research that gets done. Begin typing your search term above and press enter to search.
Press ESC to cancel.
0コメント